delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 68
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id d48527df-9170-4d81-b82c-df8840b7e9ca- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:37.963953+00:00- previous_
hash ecdd06e7285272d2706c7ea712852006dcf384bb81b064daa376ee711d4bd954- payload_
hash 518bffb27b53c69b5a8dccbf7693fcd801fa31d2e344c7df328d357096953841- entry_
hash e1606dc8eda1b1d1587833c3a12c033a975fb686d8bf8655ba64f7b91cd06e72
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-the-golden-lion-at-the-83rd-venice-film-festival-go-to-a-film-directed-by-a-woman",
"title": "Will the Golden Lion at the 83rd Venice Film Festival go to a film directed by a woman?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-09-12T12:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:37.960952Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "The 83rd Mostra runs from 2 to 12 September 2026, with awards announced on the closing day and a main competition jury presided over by Maggie Gyllenhaal. The question is about the awarded film's credited direction, not about the jury.",
"question_id": "d48527df-9170-4d81-b82c-df8840b7e9ca",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if at least one person credited as director of the Golden Lion winner on the official Biennale awards page is a woman. Co-direction counts. The official page governs, not press descriptions.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2026-09-13T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "Official awards announcement at https://www.labiennale.org/en/cinema/2026.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 68
- tree_
size - 181
- leaf_
hash eaf3a1149e9cf29206249566f54bd6b82641f561db1be6c98ee0e142422b5af9- audit_
path (8) 0: 51a47884a25241d4716d340d26ad5e3fe1eec4adb4a03cf7b41d02a55c86e6111: 81bfeb2a774776103182a65b9a69615e6210672d9d7badf4cd33b7294849bf4d2: a88ad8907b57aa46407232eb82bcc4a6cc8639e1592dd98029abdf0e1bc0f1273: f4a68b91efeded9ba075d89086c93a42419b28e2a8d1828dc64e70cc58b74a724: 90ca477c832ae34ed00dfa76c2b10e36cff69ccd72ce614d0c507e05920007b15: bfda397922356f7a423fafc090d2af03517b89157a8d6cc66d277e2cca96e8316: 9fe2edb4769e24911c893b0836891045cef78ef8ed4ae19ec89e6d92edfad5a37: 9635acfeb8c2590a96fbee35cfdc30839f075e00ba35b025d06547731fc18743- root_
hash 4c26c3ce818fe1e45410fef48bf0969b94f9e5bc0389388f5310d968c2e42fdc
The earliest published head that covers this entry
No published tree head covers this entry yet, so there is nothing signed to check it against. That is the ordinary state of an entry appended since the last checkpoint, and it is neither a failure nor a permanent one.
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 8