delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 66
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id 24c5a768-70af-4997-afe5-05e9edc2e4a7- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:37.885211+00:00- previous_
hash 4702fd031218962c96ebbef6c8b2e241167b963e25c3e9edd405c21dd87c2f2f- payload_
hash ec139e39b3941a36ea5e0c36ddac9e6a16b9a13d2c954920e498b020f77726e2- entry_
hash d5b3c940da5943f90ffd27adde4378f1effeebb26b4889ec3580bc45201455e2
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-grand-theft-auto-vi-be-available-for-purchase-on-or-before-19-november-2026",
"title": "Will Grand Theft Auto VI be available for purchase on or before 19 November 2026?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-09-15T22:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:37.882113Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "The title has been delayed twice, from autumn 2025 to 26 May 2026 and then to 19 November 2026. A third delay is neither obviously likely nor obviously unlikely.",
"question_id": "24c5a768-70af-4997-afe5-05e9edc2e4a7",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if the game can be purchased through normal retail on at least one of its announced platforms on or before 19 November 2026. Pre-orders do not count.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2026-11-20T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "Rockstar Games Newswire at https://www.rockstargames.com/newswire and the official PlayStation and Xbox store listings.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 66
- tree_
size - 2265
- leaf_
hash c153950e288e34147ef6f158b6402bfd29b2b9711f8f4e395a1b679a7e34ca3d- audit_
path (12) 0: 2ef0c35f3a17127abd6a04f48c4fd085e1040e48c6c0d072fa6bb057d0910e2b1: 8ea88b6be8ae25f8d511e2f0a60728b008aec10ab40e06814f478fd17b24cdd42: 40ecbcca1de18289107f2ca219e58a6a6395d60f627d6771a43cf367290f31023: f4a68b91efeded9ba075d89086c93a42419b28e2a8d1828dc64e70cc58b74a724: 90ca477c832ae34ed00dfa76c2b10e36cff69ccd72ce614d0c507e05920007b15: bfda397922356f7a423fafc090d2af03517b89157a8d6cc66d277e2cca96e8316: 9fe2edb4769e24911c893b0836891045cef78ef8ed4ae19ec89e6d92edfad5a37: 925d039cfaa2795efce751d71988395a9d8544d4910a71d82c761e6c8e51ba2e8: 6e5b02022079dc614c5f74ca1c784cf9700d832e05c2eec11f0ad0a37376b46d9: 2fb679aab258481705c982e553094522ea7bb93361711a8387ebf359e8c3e43110: 86666e2cb262024eb1c2584c671184dc2fb8b8d41a345bde94ca518e487ac23911: 15428b80842f9a0801cf7667918b216c9ce4186d9825e806ba86972b039c03f9- root_
hash 0feab2262fa1e39174e25fc17ea9383a6fe15fa5d22c96afd722849e59baa3f5
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 374
- signed at
- 19 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash ecf4adc708ae542a0339e03fd4cc181cf49d0329768627c5345c915a58bd813a- signature
3yL+JZfMhiQ6rm5rCTTg7iT+or04nCGVcQ08ILMw/d7eqvR4Jid7cEg2rQU5fCX7llStjVkTC9jVZjfGQvtMAg==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 12