delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 48
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id 0485b0c1-a674-414e-9778-a898c974bd9d- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:37.128408+00:00- previous_
hash ba56bbe3823b0b5d38bbfd8f8813411cd7da59c04f080a107a498dc287920f63- payload_
hash 7e71fcf31a1bfdf5021f37b8085cc5f6ef4e7a22e2581880e29d9d3ce97b091b- entry_
hash 52cd1c8a9cb09ff218501a3fd4e5369d4f061218fc3089d9f4ec1028f225cbe0
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-the-2026-arctic-sea-ice-minimum-fall-below-4-50-million-square-kilometres",
"title": "Will the 2026 Arctic sea ice minimum fall below 4.50 million square kilometres?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-09-01T12:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:37.125537Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "Extent stood at 7.02 million square kilometres on 2 August 2026, the ninth lowest for that date in the satellite record. Seasonal outlooks put the September minimum somewhere between 3.99 and 5.68 million square kilometres.",
"question_id": "0485b0c1-a674-414e-9778-a898c974bd9d",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if NSIDC reports the 2026 annual minimum extent as strictly below 4.50 million square kilometres. The confirmed minimum governs, not daily values during the season.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2026-10-05T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "NSIDC Sea Ice Today analyses at https://nsidc.org/sea-ice-today/analyses.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 48
- tree_
size - 2265
- leaf_
hash b2877129ae69cc147865cdeccdd51cc80076f85e7e89b814c8410c245298c18e- audit_
path (12) 0: 7fea16177ef493ab3ccd0b14d8533b98bfcea7d34f37c542dc82d2040132dc251: d68db828e59419a762bf836df25d0387f1cf937c9e958fb685938a519bc346db2: 575d95304450173ca4c6ce66d688d95c5abb0e6b923bcbf1c78a25de9ec4c02a3: 59b626cca7986be0b6ec44fe0d4d89e3fdbd22110dbe11bf0c1a9d22fcaf178b4: 2470c45a41e5b2338cd0a79e1b28f402a0e7e23251bee7ed256b2f8f028ccbe75: 0dec549ee6527dafc0e801068f2df8c4eef8fcb9972397c6eb58217673bbfe9c6: 432b3bec17cc8d9bd118f5d2d11fc56d0578ec1940af60be2192f2f1b8d43dc67: 925d039cfaa2795efce751d71988395a9d8544d4910a71d82c761e6c8e51ba2e8: 6e5b02022079dc614c5f74ca1c784cf9700d832e05c2eec11f0ad0a37376b46d9: 2fb679aab258481705c982e553094522ea7bb93361711a8387ebf359e8c3e43110: 86666e2cb262024eb1c2584c671184dc2fb8b8d41a345bde94ca518e487ac23911: 15428b80842f9a0801cf7667918b216c9ce4186d9825e806ba86972b039c03f9- root_
hash 0feab2262fa1e39174e25fc17ea9383a6fe15fa5d22c96afd722849e59baa3f5
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 374
- signed at
- 19 Aug 2026, 20:25 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash ecf4adc708ae542a0339e03fd4cc181cf49d0329768627c5345c915a58bd813a- signature
3yL+JZfMhiQ6rm5rCTTg7iT+or04nCGVcQ08ILMw/d7eqvR4Jid7cEg2rQU5fCX7llStjVkTC9jVZjfGQvtMAg==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 12