delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 40
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id 3b1bf8d0-fa87-4392-b4cf-333e6cba3622- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:36.772050+00:00- previous_
hash 1b7ea6189c5304c145586ad065ba70d2b6aba605a10cb8dd4f2c52a2e93ee037- payload_
hash c392d1317161c952e0cf376276138887e8e95ba58be2ccdb160f6606aecbfe45- entry_
hash f0ea93b64670f61d31a2142d469f8c0a0f0944238c87ee8f4e2187a629fc1b4f
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-blue-origin-launch-a-new-glenn-rocket-before-the-end-of-2026",
"title": "Will Blue Origin launch a New Glenn rocket before the end of 2026?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-09-30T22:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:36.769155Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "New Glenn suffered a hotfire anomaly on 28 May 2026. Blue Origin has said it will return to flight before the end of the year, and a Telesat mission has been indicated for November, but no date is confirmed.",
"question_id": "3b1bf8d0-fa87-4392-b4cf-333e6cba3622",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if a New Glenn vehicle lifts off on or before 31 December 2026. An abort before liftoff does not count.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2027-01-05T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "Blue Origin newsroom at https://www.blueorigin.com/news.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 40
- tree_
size - 181
- leaf_
hash 34bac4d4e3bdd62156fd87fe983c76f292f85cc21204d83cac65fc7dc01679e3- audit_
path (8) 0: 5d33306b1ba0d39b0095db348cf78d8b0f5f10f0e856222e0fec80d2cdcf8f251: 7564f62e10b103d7be851b617654caea05a1fae83af3f44d15034746114ea7bc2: 0baf3654c73426a38b560fa17a3cc926f6f5ba7d82e6a066c94ef3def4ed58c93: eaeacbd8d319b9d776cf6f767329e32539ccecb621836ffea46c36ad501849234: 44572e1f9d85cea0b2eeaa0aa227d6fb80c1e5448efb5228f587d667c12052dd5: 0dec549ee6527dafc0e801068f2df8c4eef8fcb9972397c6eb58217673bbfe9c6: 432b3bec17cc8d9bd118f5d2d11fc56d0578ec1940af60be2192f2f1b8d43dc67: 9635acfeb8c2590a96fbee35cfdc30839f075e00ba35b025d06547731fc18743- root_
hash 4c26c3ce818fe1e45410fef48bf0969b94f9e5bc0389388f5310d968c2e42fdc
The earliest published head that covers this entry
No published tree head covers this entry yet, so there is nothing signed to check it against. That is the ordinary state of an entry appended since the last checkpoint, and it is neither a failure nor a permanent one.
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 8