delphi.consensus.snapshot
Appended 25 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2129
- entry_
type delphi.consensus.snapshot- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id - withheld with the payload. this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
- logged_
at 2026-09-25T05:30:42.669957+00:00- previous_
hash 80ef17ffd30608789d6cad069a5dd12fd35700a843115a637a6f56f9807b905f- payload_
hash a2f52ec38ffbb60efca857009fb027bbda5e4b1532307d5e06cffbc1a2875eb5- entry_
hash 382cbf4f26f1cada714dfeacaaadfa3b3fe84f3c5aa4ad8279dcc5f1cc9b6b80
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload withheld
Payload
withheld by the blind gate
this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
The entry, its hash and its position in the chain are all here, and every proof over it below is fully verifiable — a verifier can confirm this entry exists under a signed root without being told what it says.
Which digest recipe applies
This entry carries no version key. Absent means v1 — the unsalted recipe from before migration 0021 — and that is the log's own rule rather than a guess made here. It is worth stating plainly because it is the opposite of the default a reader would assume: the newest recipe is the one that has to say so.
as above with no salt key at all. The shape every entry written before the salt existed was computed under; those entries are immutable and stay verifiable this way
No opening is served for this entry, so the digest cannot be reopened here. On an unsalted batch that is not a barrier — the digest opens from the readings alone — and on a salted one the salt is released on the same disclosure gate as every other surface.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2129
- tree_
size - 2357
- leaf_
hash ebf4b9489efe88af0065cf81ad83ad8abc56094db142bced692e5d347e80dd32- audit_
path (10) 0: 18c89bc9f60cf957a7a6e32ea9493062a89c7dcfa5e432f96fee1c4c5ab548ef1: aaa679815d30f5afda7c24b21dc91249cc29df370800c3161111b32c20abee3e2: 4c199c9ddfcf61dfc4c5222e5d63f0718579d1ba149d2e3273ebe33f30fae9063: 58599a8566d283033fc9240974799e6ba9de49b9f57b2907c3d6d597e179459f4: 94cf1066bdfde7962a00d5f80ce3f8520c0efa3cc3386dfa8ff7b5cf3002e6985: 559bc6d68b20ef3ce754297613d102bda419cb61cab1971c2f441622cd86f40c6: f4d02cca79f588f9c172b1dc53f54784db35848f8f8b4fa96ae1493d76b463787: 32d97e61743fccf6d32da7a407cb944cdd5c52aa0de4e874e2c78dadf7892a908: b2c4aa6040f878f3778bb1b9f9de1e703711b5846ca7e47c80f789c39ae1714b9: c2a61f9c340fe90eca96b6ee3ce7a915f3c652848ec632eaa3e641ee4f30439d- root_
hash 58c8c5ab99dba36e8c6b398578e37592253a716c9cf756f72e78b6606a198d59
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 2135
- signed at
- 25 Sept 2026, 05:30 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash 45e4998f74d5c216e9d9da4088fefb456c0aa83e21edb4035f581e57b15431a0- signature
zdy+vfo0PbejA1KdjFDDhWpugBbEt8J/FMJk2Vz2wJbl7wwNofT7wjsVH+qSOXUuNAQhUmxVRVTnm/IWY5iEDA==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 10