delphi.consensus.snapshot
Appended 24 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2104
- entry_
type delphi.consensus.snapshot- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id - withheld with the payload. this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
- logged_
at 2026-09-24T05:31:21.496959+00:00- previous_
hash b1741e9ef6bd553636ede966984ccda5edb42baee8d19c743f9bcf50a2404ebb- payload_
hash 394f9f515ee63a01f9a3a9a48550fce0ea7cc4348b34d7ca8ac3e901eed14b9b- entry_
hash 78448d9ca174c832170d4fc281b6befcdc04d982400efc5d8c4938ce20a46056
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload withheld
Payload
withheld by the blind gate
this entry records a consensus reading on a blind question, and it is appended whenever somebody forecasts on that question — so naming the question would say that somebody just did, which is precisely what blind mode withholds. The reading and the salt that opens its commitment are released when forecasting closes. The hash chain and every proof over it remain verifiable meanwhile.
The entry, its hash and its position in the chain are all here, and every proof over it below is fully verifiable — a verifier can confirm this entry exists under a signed root without being told what it says.
Which digest recipe applies
This entry carries no version key. Absent means v1 — the unsalted recipe from before migration 0021 — and that is the log's own rule rather than a guess made here. It is worth stating plainly because it is the opposite of the default a reader would assume: the newest recipe is the one that has to say so.
as above with no salt key at all. The shape every entry written before the salt existed was computed under; those entries are immutable and stay verifiable this way
No opening is served for this entry, so the digest cannot be reopened here. On an unsalted batch that is not a barrier — the digest opens from the readings alone — and on a salted one the salt is released on the same disclosure gate as every other surface.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2104
- tree_
size - 2323
- leaf_
hash fad9ca096ff0a824000ea77714482365f2efb5498e5f78759473a0d169894dd8- audit_
path (10) 0: c03ab3348c46947791a1f8db01ce75b72dc5ee94073992f908aa7b262df98eed1: 6dffe6f64a535383b3424680b10f0edb26e03232a35d036cbab7ba24b61f9f382: d77d25706ad7e55f5c0bc9e34733f55c19df96aa66b7312d88b99a41685649c63: 7298569a5e56d85384d7bb47225ea5e596271300207ab863088f070cc2bd7de54: b50be66eb4e6d6522ae5a50862f42e8f6a5663bd96a07ce297353a7a9eac28d85: 3409250b2a7726d8587c9c1abf72ab8a5f5c9da864649b1684c0d122c06aa26c6: 97e580b0f254128201e36dc81f73bca17443fd5e21d28fd611b3832d3123cce37: 32d97e61743fccf6d32da7a407cb944cdd5c52aa0de4e874e2c78dadf7892a908: 5e9140bf6a27af59662506446284cbb48435902283d7c94d917dc40cf69db8729: c2a61f9c340fe90eca96b6ee3ce7a915f3c652848ec632eaa3e641ee4f30439d- root_
hash d5cdf3ada5e9d6ff6f86cc94c6a7cd9965df1cd86b6e68dd8030daf1fd3631be
The earliest published head that covers this entry
- tree_
size - 2109
- signed at
- 24 Sept 2026, 05:31 UTC
- key_
id 042b55492fabadcb8ffb9fe4e9b6a3e8- root_
hash a31f6b62ecd0a5a7c1047a6a100107a943b510cb76232ce57ee7beb14ed29366- signature
XPXY8TNF05VBXoAX7JDAXHp2GQM3ww78P37YW9pWBrGYGusEDyuG6M7S/0ia9+KBJ+KmQC26izeb9cFfRf3XBw==
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 10