delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 2
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id 29f1e88a-b6de-480c-bc2f-f234c647455d- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:34.946374+00:00- previous_
hash a08f37cff791ca765b33214e127264b9cc0b08d83396dee596c2148a558b16a9- payload_
hash e7206e44ea4245a4abb44ddbd9a3c5b44c2080f146e424842856fa9b3513c300- entry_
hash db51f805415be5276de363d4208f9af9b32f48903201c2f3c0f77ca829a890c6
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-euro-area-annual-hicp-inflation-for-september-2026-fall-below-2-8",
"title": "Will euro-area annual HICP inflation for September 2026 fall below 2.8 %?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-10-02T07:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:34.943230Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "The downward counterpart to the August question. Two prints, two directions, same source and same rule: a forecaster right on both has said something about the trend rather than about one month.",
"question_id": "29f1e88a-b6de-480c-bc2f-f234c647455d",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if the headline annual rate in the Eurostat flash estimate for September 2026 is strictly below 2.8 %, as first published.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2026-10-02T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "Eurostat euro indicators news release at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/news/euro-indicators.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 2
- tree_
size - 179
- leaf_
hash 704de14f0fc230539ab70920f6bed547319e6b7920ed0db393c0ca7c3b424573- audit_
path (8) 0: 2199fd496060f2b50b8f7b39019c20231b4b52f3bd0fce091233bfb1b6939e8a1: 7ba86a7b7d25138fd1bff2ea38fdd8d3e46ca76d56224bdb733a6f0b71a6108d2: 0181e023c12bf413471cf696a1f35b944e2aa91d05e94025e4ca983e5220b8f53: 6accee06a91eebe583c1229064362cefcdec41ff4bb0d38479e32b13cdf4cc7a4: b70d290aa081a17cfd1dd59b61f1a28551b4aa8df2915bb773f8eda8b60841055: b74c92a6356a40d4a8987db99772ead75d18bf349905054ba53bbc3401d9b2b96: 432b3bec17cc8d9bd118f5d2d11fc56d0578ec1940af60be2192f2f1b8d43dc67: 3f76b135a3f3ce5dc862e0e2e004c9eff2bbf99040ca47c64d64cec42062fd34- root_
hash b6268ac6224d3cfeaf4fdd2e07881a4bb21cf8ed320580fb2a683f4427a55006
The earliest published head that covers this entry
No published tree head covers this entry yet, so there is nothing signed to check it against. That is the ordinary state of an entry appended since the last checkpoint, and it is neither a failure nor a permanent one.
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 8