← the log
sequence 2

delphi.question.published

Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.

01. Link to this band.

The entry

entry_hashdb51f805415b. The chained hash of entry 2, which is what every proof on this page is about.REAL_UTC
sequence_number
2
entry_type
delphi.question.published
entity_type
forecast_question
entity_id
29f1e88a-b6de-480c-bc2f-f234c647455d
logged_at
2026-08-15T15:53:34.946374+00:00
previous_hash
a08f37cff791ca765b33214e127264b9cc0b08d83396dee596c2148a558b16a9
payload_hash
e7206e44ea4245a4abb44ddbd9a3c5b44c2080f146e424842856fa9b3513c300
entry_hash
db51f805415be5276de363d4208f9af9b32f48903201c2f3c0f77ca829a890c6

sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served

02. Link to this band.

Payload

{
  "slug": "will-euro-area-annual-hicp-inflation-for-september-2026-fall-below-2-8",
  "title": "Will euro-area annual HICP inflation for September 2026 fall below 2.8 %?",
  "origin": "EDITORIAL",
  "timebase": {
    "clock": "REAL_UTC"
  },
  "closes_at": "2026-10-02T07:00:00.000000Z",
  "opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:34.943230Z",
  "blind_mode": true,
  "provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
  "description": "The downward counterpart to the August question. Two prints, two directions, same source and same rule: a forecaster right on both has said something about the trend rather than about one month.",
  "question_id": "29f1e88a-b6de-480c-bc2f-f234c647455d",
  "resolution_criteria": "YES if the headline annual rate in the Eurostat flash estimate for September 2026 is strictly below 2.8 %, as first published.",
  "expected_resolution_at": "2026-10-02T12:00:00.000000Z",
  "canonical_source_policy": "Eurostat euro indicators news release at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/news/euro-indicators.",
  "resolution_rule_revision": 1
}

Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.

03. Link to this band.

Verify it here

computed in your browser, not on the server

Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.

The proof, as served

leaf_index
2
tree_size
179
leaf_hash
704de14f0fc230539ab70920f6bed547319e6b7920ed0db393c0ca7c3b424573
audit_path (8)
0: 2199fd496060f2b50b8f7b39019c20231b4b52f3bd0fce091233bfb1b6939e8a1: 7ba86a7b7d25138fd1bff2ea38fdd8d3e46ca76d56224bdb733a6f0b71a6108d2: 0181e023c12bf413471cf696a1f35b944e2aa91d05e94025e4ca983e5220b8f53: 6accee06a91eebe583c1229064362cefcdec41ff4bb0d38479e32b13cdf4cc7a4: b70d290aa081a17cfd1dd59b61f1a28551b4aa8df2915bb773f8eda8b60841055: b74c92a6356a40d4a8987db99772ead75d18bf349905054ba53bbc3401d9b2b96: 432b3bec17cc8d9bd118f5d2d11fc56d0578ec1940af60be2192f2f1b8d43dc67: 3f76b135a3f3ce5dc862e0e2e004c9eff2bbf99040ca47c64d64cec42062fd34
root_hash
b6268ac6224d3cfeaf4fdd2e07881a4bb21cf8ed320580fb2a683f4427a55006

The earliest published head that covers this entry

No published tree head covers this entry yet, so there is nothing signed to check it against. That is the ordinary state of an entry appended since the last checkpoint, and it is neither a failure nor a permanent one.

sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 8