delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 10
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id 04bc3a9c-76fe-4aad-90b1-e3640e548e9c- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:35.392252+00:00- previous_
hash 71ae086b7e8e01710894459188a736bd0c12ddf7f552e7ead39232afee699c10- payload_
hash ad9fbdee3ed613a9c138a2656e068f7f1ec5c508d2764b305b5ad51ae23998d1- entry_
hash e4f4242fc96b20c3f6a74c2ff568960fba5fa14517c70c043ffd5b848835d43e
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-any-party-win-an-absolute-majority-of-seats-in-mecklenburg-vorpommern-on-20-september",
"title": "Will any party win an absolute majority of seats in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern on 20 September?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-09-20T16:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:35.389230Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "Mecklenburg-Vorpommern elects its state parliament on 20 September 2026. An absolute majority for a single party is rare in German state parliaments but not unheard of.",
"question_id": "04bc3a9c-76fe-4aad-90b1-e3640e548e9c",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if one party holds more than half of all seats in the preliminary official seat allocation published by the Landeswahlleiter Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2026-09-21T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "Preliminary official result published by the Landeswahlleiter Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 10
- tree_
size - 179
- leaf_
hash b995d45c818eaa2918ffbfc0eb9e3af44883664545e905b554480a63a45f701f- audit_
path (8) 0: 83756849c974b77d4758d4b9b842ee374adace5ea6400c54f7549a6d573394551: 47df66d308a32e7021b325d9d3dab64f38814a100bd3a4e4f89259e5cd0f084a2: a77f24677127c7bb35e52e72ee1428c6a7bfe467916fe7deeba51f69a6c00b483: d7c05425bf6e3fadbed68d9552781d28647454d6dad43f268ec9145a2b4220fe4: b70d290aa081a17cfd1dd59b61f1a28551b4aa8df2915bb773f8eda8b60841055: b74c92a6356a40d4a8987db99772ead75d18bf349905054ba53bbc3401d9b2b96: 432b3bec17cc8d9bd118f5d2d11fc56d0578ec1940af60be2192f2f1b8d43dc67: 3f76b135a3f3ce5dc862e0e2e004c9eff2bbf99040ca47c64d64cec42062fd34- root_
hash b6268ac6224d3cfeaf4fdd2e07881a4bb21cf8ed320580fb2a683f4427a55006
The earliest published head that covers this entry
No published tree head covers this entry yet, so there is nothing signed to check it against. That is the ordinary state of an entry appended since the last checkpoint, and it is neither a failure nor a permanent one.
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 8