delphi.question.published
Appended 15 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC. Its place in the chain is fixed by the hash of the entry before it; what follows is whether that place is covered by a signature.
The entry
- sequence_
number - 0
- entry_
type delphi.question.published- entity_
type forecast_question - entity_
id 48ef81cc-e8c7-4059-91e1-550a9ffc1391- logged_
at 2026-08-15T15:53:34.861876+00:00- previous_
hash 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000- payload_
hash 9ddc30b552df4fa480bbca50931cac2faa2bd72ee70bdc273585cffaf50d1b08- entry_
hash fc38e85ac3ddefc3e3f018aaf59a399ad9e167a370d9c62434b26b6a48cfc402
sourceGET /api/transparency/entries/{n}· one entry, as served to this reader· payload served
Payload
{
"slug": "will-euro-area-annual-hicp-inflation-for-august-2026-come-in-at-3-0-or-higher",
"title": "Will euro-area annual HICP inflation for August 2026 come in at 3.0 % or higher?",
"origin": "EDITORIAL",
"timebase": {
"clock": "REAL_UTC"
},
"closes_at": "2026-09-01T07:00:00.000000Z",
"opened_at": "2026-08-15T15:53:34.856523Z",
"blind_mode": true,
"provenance": "PUBLIC_RECORD",
"description": "Eurostat publishes a flash estimate of euro-area annual inflation on the first working day after the reference month. July 2026 came in at 2.9 %, up from 2.8 % in June. This asks whether the August flash crosses the 3.0 % line.",
"question_id": "48ef81cc-e8c7-4059-91e1-550a9ffc1391",
"resolution_criteria": "YES if the headline annual rate in the Eurostat flash estimate for August 2026 is 3.0 % or higher, as first published. Later revisions do not change the resolution.",
"expected_resolution_at": "2026-09-01T12:00:00.000000Z",
"canonical_source_policy": "Eurostat euro indicators news release at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/news/euro-indicators — the flash estimate for August 2026.",
"resolution_rule_revision": 1
}Shown indented so it can be read. The hash is taken over the canonical form of the same object — keys sorted by code point, no insignificant whitespace, UTF-8 rather than escaped ASCII, timestamps RFC 3339 in UTC to microseconds, decimals as their plain string form. The check below re-encodes the object canonically before hashing it, which is why an indented display cannot make it pass or fail.
Verify it here
Recomputing the hashes in this browser… If this sentence stays, this browser has no Web Crypto and nothing here has been verified locally.
The proof, as served
- leaf_
index - 0
- tree_
size - 179
- leaf_
hash e6f9f9e33b9065874d934ce34dabf53925268e64079284b5a099f680365356d6- audit_
path (8) 0: d9ca974c0cede57541dfcb283976c1340ad8f35bdc792d9a7e6c6470000dbe3f1: e18ecbcea86ce9cf0f0dbf66c3b29f8dae9b8f568206fc665cdfcb803cd7c5902: 0181e023c12bf413471cf696a1f35b944e2aa91d05e94025e4ca983e5220b8f53: 6accee06a91eebe583c1229064362cefcdec41ff4bb0d38479e32b13cdf4cc7a4: b70d290aa081a17cfd1dd59b61f1a28551b4aa8df2915bb773f8eda8b60841055: b74c92a6356a40d4a8987db99772ead75d18bf349905054ba53bbc3401d9b2b96: 432b3bec17cc8d9bd118f5d2d11fc56d0578ec1940af60be2192f2f1b8d43dc67: 3f76b135a3f3ce5dc862e0e2e004c9eff2bbf99040ca47c64d64cec42062fd34- root_
hash b6268ac6224d3cfeaf4fdd2e07881a4bb21cf8ed320580fb2a683f4427a55006
The earliest published head that covers this entry
No published tree head covers this entry yet, so there is nothing signed to check it against. That is the ordinary state of an entry appended since the last checkpoint, and it is neither a failure nor a permanent one.
sourceGET /api/transparency/proof/inclusion· leaf_hash, audit_path, root_hash· audit-path nodes: 8